Category: <span>New Testament</span>

Luke recorded the life and ministry of Jesus so that his friend Theophilus could have an accurate basis for his faith (Luke 1:1-4). The events of Jesus’ life fulfilled both general and specific ideas prophesied in the Old Testament. Luke noted that even before Jesus was born, angelic messengers and Jesus’ family spoke of Jesus in light of the Old Testament. In the final two chapters of Luke’s Gospel, Luke recorded Jesus’ own use of the Old Testament. After His resurrection, Jesus repeatedly announced that Scripture’s storyline pointed to what He had just accomplished in Jerusalem.

(1) In Luke 23:30, Jesus cited Hos 10:8 to describe the fate of Jerusalem. In Hose 10:1-10, the prophet lamented Israel’s unfaithfulness. The people were false and idolatrous, wealthy and secure. Disaster would come upon them, Hosea prophesied, even to the degree that the people would cry out for rocks to fall upon them (Hos 10:8). As Jesus tottered toward Golgotha, He prophesied to those gathered around Him that the situation in Jerusalem would deteriorate to the point where people would want rocks to fall upon them (Luke 23:30), just as Hosea had prophesied.

(2) In Luke 23:46, Jesus expressed His trust in God by quoting Ps 31:5 as He was dying on the cross. Before Jesus succumbed to death on the cross, He was able to speak for a time (Matt 27:45-56//Mark 15:33-41//Luke 23:44-49). Luke wrote that Jesus quoted from Psalm 31, where David felt surrounded by his enemies and cried out to God, “You will free me from the net that is secretly set for me, for You are my refuge. Into Your hands I entrust my spirit; You redeem me, LORD, God of truth” (Ps 31:4-5). What the Jewish leadership had arranged by deception, Jesus understood to be from God, and so entrusted Himself to the Father.

(3) In Luke 24:25-27 and 44-46, Jesus explained to various groups of disciples that His suffering and death fulfilled what the Old Testament authors prophesied concerning the Messiah. While Jesus was walking on the road to Emmaus with the two disciples, He asked them, “Didn’t the Messiah have to suffer these things and enter into His glory?” (Luke 24:26). Luke reported that Jesus then interpreted for them the prophetic statements concerning Himself in all the Scriptures (Luke 24:27). After Jesus suddenly disappeared from their sight, the two Emmaus disciples scurried to Jerusalem, where Jesus met them and the other disciples. Jesus ate in their presence (Luke 24:41-42) and again explained His death and resurrection as the fulfillment of all that was written “in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms” (Luke 24:44).

Luke said that he wanted to write for Theophilus an orderly sequence of the events that had taken place in the life and ministry of Jesus and His followers (Luke 1:1-3). Throughout his Gospel, Luke labored to help his readers celebrate the arrival of the kingdom of God and the salvation Messiah offered to even the outcasts of Jewish society. The events of the last week of Jesus’ life showed His unique place in the unfolding of redemptive history.

(1) In Luke 21:20, Jesus prophesied of the desolation that would come upon Jerusalem using language consistent with Dan 9:26-27. The angel Gabriel appeared to Daniel in answer to Daniel’s prayer of repentance and forgiveness. Gabriel told Daniel that a nation would oppose God’s people, bringing destruction upon Jerusalem and the temple (Dan 9:27). In the midst of describing many instances of persecution that would come upon the disciples, Jesus placed special attention upon the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt 24:15-22//Mark 13:14-20//Luke 21:20-24). Jesus said, “When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that its desolation has come near” (Luke 21:20). Jesus’ prophecy came true, at least in part, when the Romans laid siege to Jerusalem in A.D. 68-70. On the whole, Jesus’ message for the disciples was clear: “Be on your guard, so that your minds are not dulled from carousing, drunkenness, and worries of life, or that day will come on you unexpectedly like a trap…But be alert at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that are going to take place and to stand before the Son of Man” (Luke 21:34-35a, 36).

(2) In Luke 22:14-23, Jesus fulfilled Israel’s Passover celebration and instituted a new meal commemorating His death and resurrection. The Lord established the Passover as an annual reminder of God’s redemptive power in rescuing the nation of Israel from the clutches of the Egypt. In Exodus 12-13, Moses emphasized that as Israel remembered what God had done for them they would be less susceptible to idolatry, have the courage necessary to stand against their enemies, and have the means to provide successive generations with a visual representation of God’s work in history. Jesus established a new covenant in His own blood (Matt 26:26-29//Mark 14:22-25//Luke 22:17-20), telling the twelve, “It is shed for you” (Luke 22:20). Jesus instituted a new situation and a new meal, shifting the focus of God’s people from the Passover to the supper that would commemorate His death and resurrection. In the Lord’s Supper, followers of Christ remember the gift of forgiveness, the demand for obedience to His commands, and the corresponding responsibility to care for one another. Paul chastised the Corinthians because when they came together to partake of the Lord’s Supper, they were actually a divided community; the wealthy separated themselves from the impoverished with the result that factions had arisen among the people. Paul wrote, “Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy way will be guilty of sin against the body and blood of the Lord. So a man should examine himself; in this way he should eat of the bread and drink of the cup” (1 Cor 11:27-28).

(3) In Luke 22:37, Jesus cited Isa 53:12 to portray the danger that was coming upon Himself and the disciples. In Isaiah 53, the prophet outlined the suffering Servant of the Lord. Isaiah concluded the chapter with a messianic prophecy: “I will give Him the many as a portion, and He will receive the mighty as spoil, because He submitted Himself to death, and was counted among the rebels; yet He bore the sin of many and interceded for the rebels” (Isa 53:12). Jesus was identified as Isaiah’s suffering Servant, the One who would take on Himself the punishment for the sins of the people, being counted among the criminals. Jesus’ point with Isa 53:12 was that since He would in fact have to suffer as a criminal, being treated like an enemy of the public, the eleven should be concerned that the Jewish leadership and Rome would come against them as well.

In Luke 9:51-19:41, the author recorded Jesus’ final trip to Jerusalem. Along the way, Jesus taught His disciples and the crowds about the kingdom of God. Jesus’ use of the Old Testament in Luke 19-20 reinforced His supremacy in the narrative of Israel’s religion.

(1) In Luke 19:9, Jesus justified His mercy toward Zacchaeus based on the fact that Zacchaeus was a son of Abraham. In Gen 12:1-3 and 15:1-6, God promised Abraham that He would give him both land and descendants, blessing all nations through him. In Luke 13:10-17, Jesus healed a crippled woman in a synagogue of Galilee on the Sabbath; He justified His apparent setting aside of Sabbath work restrictions by appealing to the woman’s place in the line of Abraham. Though the Pharisees despised Zacchaeus because he was a chief tax collector and wealthy (Luke 19:2), Jesus consented to Zacchaeus’ offer of hospitality because Zacchaeus was a son of Abraham (Luke 19:9). What marked Zacchaeus as a recipient of the kingdom was not just the fact that he was an Israelite, but also that he repented, giving half of his possessions to the poor and pledging to pay back fourfold those whom he had defrauded (Luke 19:8).

(2) In Luke 19:38, the crowds praised Jesus by lauding Him in light of Ps 118:26. Psalm 118 is a poem of thanksgiving for God’s victorious deliverance. Though the psalmist endured opposition from the nations surrounding Israel, the Lord helped His people. In Jerusalem, the people rejoiced in the one the Lord sent to rescue them saying, “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD” (Ps 118:26). The crowds welcomed Jesus to Jerusalem by singing to Him the song of Psalm 118 (Matt 21:1-9//Mark 11:1-10//Luke 19:28-40). But Jesus’ tears over Jerusalem made clear that the fullness of the kingdom would not arrive until a later time (Luke 19:41-44). Jerusalem, long the center of spiritual life for the children of Abraham (2 Samuel 6; 1 Kings 8-9; 2 Kings 24-25; Nehemiah 1), was now destined to be destroyed.

(3) In Luke 19:46, Jesus cited Isa 56:7 and Jer 7:11 to confront those buying and selling merchandise in the temple, distracting worship. In Isaiah 56, Isaiah announced that when the Messiah arrived, the nations would gather with Israel and worship God in the temple. God’s house would be a house of prayer for the nations (Isa 56:7). In Jeremiah 7, the prophet confronted the people of Judah because when they were away from the temple, they practiced idolatry and exhibited greed. So, because the people were robbers, when they came into the temple, God’s house became a den of thieves (Jer 7:11). When Jesus came near to the temple (Matt 21:12-17//Mark 11:15-18//Luke 19:45-48), He “began to throw out those who were selling, and He said, ‘It is written, My house will be a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves!’” (Luke 19:46).

(4) In Luke 20:17, Jesus cited Ps 118:22 to help His opponents interpret the Parable of the Vineyard Owner. Jesus told the Parable of a Vineyard Owner to describe God’s judgement upon Israel for their rejection of the prophets and their rejection of Himself (Matt 21:33-46//Mark 12:1-12//Luke 20:9-19). When Jesus told the Jewish leadership that God was taking the vineyard from them and giving it to others, they objected, “No!” (Luke 20:16). Indeed, they would even reject Jesus to maintain their clutch on Israel’s religion. But they would fail—as Jesus said via Ps 118:22, “The stone that the builders rejected—this has become the cornerstone” (Luke 20:17).

(5) In Luke 20:28, 37, the Sadducees cited Deut 25:5 and Jesus cited Exod 3:6, 15 to establish their respective views of the resurrection. The Sadducees attempted to cast doubt on Jesus by publicly asking about the resurrection (Matt 22:23-33//Mark 12:18-27//Luke 20:27-40). The Sadducees referenced Moses’ command in Deut 25:5 that a man should raise up children by the wife of his deceased brother so that Israel would grow in population and she would have an heir to support her in her older age. They asked whose wife she would be in the resurrection, her first husband’s wife or a subsequent brother who took her as his wife. Jesus said that in the resurrection, one’s relationship with God—the living God who appeared to Moses as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Exod 3:6, 15)—mattered more than what relationships one had on earth.

(6) In Luke 20:42-43, Jesus cited Ps 110:1 to portray Himself as David’s Lord and David’s Son. After responding to questions from the Jewish leadership, Jesus questioned them concerning the identity of the Messiah (Matt 22:41-46//Mark 12:35-37//Luke 20:41-44). Psalm 110 described the exalted state of Israel’s king, seated at God’s right hand and ruling the nations as both king and priest. Jesus saw in Ps 110:1 a reference to the Lord speaking to the Messiah. Jesus placed Himself in the position of the Messiah and pressed His opponents regarding how the Messiah could be both David’s Lord and David’s Son. The only valid answer was to be found in the One speaking to them.

Luke 17-18 points to the opposition Jesus faced from the Pharisees. Jesus used their erroneous, selfish point of view as a foil for instructing His followers about the characteristics of authentic discipleship. Whether Jesus was arguing with the leaders of Israel or performing messianic signs of the kingdom, Jesus demonstrated His supremacy in the revelatory acts of God. Jesus fulfilled a unique, elevated position in the storyline of Scripture.

(1) In Luke 17:11-19, Jesus healed ten lepers by declaring them clean. Because skin diseases can be highly contagious, in Leviticus 13-14 Moses established laws for how priests would identify and treat conditions that could spread by contact. In Num 5:1-4, Moses reiterated the demand that those with skin diseases should be quarantined so that the contamination would not spread throughout the camp. Once the priest could no longer identify signs of infection in the diseased person, the priest would offer sacrifices on behalf of the one who was ill. Those suffering from skin diseases had to endure social and religious separation during the process of cleansing. Shocking it was then when a group of ten lepers approached Jesus begging for mercy, and Jesus declared them clean and told them to go to the priest in Jerusalem so that they could offer a sacrifice and be restored to the community. One of the ten lepers, a Samaritan, did not make it to the priest, though. Luke reported that this man returned, gave glory to God, and fell at Jesus’ feet, thanking Him (Luke 17:16).

(2) In Luke 17:26-37, Jesus argued that the Pharisees should consider the dullness of those destroyed in the days of Noah and Lot, and be prepared for the day of the Son of Man. God told both Noah (Gen 6:9-22; 2 Pet 2:5) and Lot (Gen 19:14) to announce to their audiences the imminent judgment that the Lord was bringing upon them. But Noah’s contemporaries and Lot’s sons-in-law did not give the warning a second thought. Jesus saw the same attitude in the Pharisees. They thought themselves exempt from even the possibility of condemnation, galaxies removed from the wicked of ancient times. But Jesus knew the Pharisees were as culpable as those who ignored Noah while he built the ark (Matt 24:37-38//Luke 17:26-27) and the residents of Sodom as they went about partying while Lot preached repentance. Jesus warned them to look at historical precedent and understand that their present course of pursuing earthly security would prove faulty in the day of His wrath when some would be taken and others left to destruction (Matt 24:39-41//Mark 13:15//Luke 17:30-35).

(3) In Luke 18:20, Jesus cited from the Ten Commandments to confront the rich young ruler who wanted to justify himself by mere obedience to the law. Previously, Luke reported that an expert in the law approached Jesus asking, “Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 10:25). The lawyer’s question prompted Jesus to tell the Parable of the Good Samaritan, arguing that loving one’s neighbor included loving one’s natural enemies. The rich young ruler approached Jesus with the same question, confessing to Jesus that he had kept the commandments (Matt 19:16-22//Mark 10:17-22//Luke 18:18-23). Jesus did not challenge his assertion but said, “You still lack one thing: sell all that you have and distribute it to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me” (Luke 18:22). The young man left “extremely sad,” Luke reported, “because he was very rich” (Luke 18:23). According to Jesus, obedience to the Ten Commandments did not equate to salvation (Exod 20:1-17; Deut 5:6-21). Eternal life is for those who trust Jesus’ word and obey Him.

(4) In Luke 18:31, Jesus stated that the Old Testament predicted His suffering and death at the hands of Gentiles, and the fact that He would rise on the third day. In Psalm 22, the psalmist described his sufferings—sufferings that anticipated what Jesus endured in His trial and crucifixion. In Isaiah 53, the prophet detailed the sufferings of God’s servant. In Ps 16:9-11, the psalmist stated his confidence in God to raise him to eternal life. Jesus told His disciples that the events predicted in texts like these would be accomplished in His forthcoming death and resurrection (Matt 20:17-19//Mark 10:32-34//Luke 18:31-34).

As Jesus’ popularity grew, so did the opposition He received from the contemporary Jewish leadership (Luke 12:1; 14:7-14; 18:9-14). Jesus opposed the Pharisees’ selfishness and used His debates with them to instruct His disciples in kingdom values, especially financial generosity. Jesus rebuked the Pharisees because of their selfishness and misapplication of the Old Testament. Since the Jewish leadership neglected the demands for mercy present in the Law and the Prophets, they were unable to comprehend the greater demands for unselfishness and generosity that Jesus set forth as means of participation in God’s kingdom. Jesus admonished the Pharisees for not recognizing His unique relationship with the Old Testament.

(1) In Luke 15:1-2, the Pharisees grumbled because Jesus showed hospitality to sinners, setting aside Mosaic commands related to ritual purity. In Leviticus 11 Moses catalogued animals that were unclean, commanding Israel to abstain from touching or eating them lest the nation compromise its pure status before the Lord. Moses reiterated these commands in Deut 14:3-21. The Pharisees interpreted Moses’ commands as a basis for separating from Gentiles and ceremonially unclean individuals at meals. The righteous should not associate with the unrighteous, they thought. Even the Psalms begin with the righteous happily separating themselves from the wicked: “How happy is the man who does not follow the advice of the wicked, or take the path of sinners, or join a group of mockers!” (Ps 1:1). Accordingly, Luke reported, “All the tax collectors and sinners were approaching to listen to Him. And the Pharisees and scribes were complaining, ‘This man welcomes sinners and eats with them!’” (Luke 15:1-2). The misplaced pride of the Jewish leadership occasioned Jesus’ parables of the Lost Sheep, Lost Coin, and Lost Son (Luke 15:3-32). While the Jewish leadership rejoiced over their separation from unclean sinners, heaven rejoiced over the lost being found.

(2) In Luke 16:16, Jesus said that the Law and Prophets were until John and that the kingdom of God had arrived in Himself. In essence, Jesus announced that a new standard of judgment had arrived; no longer could one point to a passage of the Law or Prophets to show their righteousness (Matt 11:12-13//Mark 13:31//Luke 16:16-17). God knows the heart, and Jesus’ ministry revealed people’s hearts in a way that the Law and the Prophets could not. The Pharisees—thinking they could employ the law to acquit themselves—were all the more guilty because the law actually pointed to Jesus and they should have recognized Him. Jesus thus reinforced the place of the law as the arrow pointing to Him, saying, “It is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter in the law to drop out” (Luke 16:16-17).

(3) In Luke 16:29-31, Jesus taught that if someone rejected the witness of the Law and the Prophets, they would not repent even if someone rose from the dead to testify of God’s judgement. The story of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) illustrated Jesus’ point in Luke 16:16-17 that the Old Testament witnessed to Himself. The story of the Rich Man and Lazarus reinforced the theme of financial stewardship that Jesus introduced in the Parable of the Lost Son and was still on the minds of the Pharisees after the Parable of the Unjust Steward (Luke 16:14). In the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus, a poor, ill man was left at the rich man’s gate. Both men died, but in the afterlife their circumstances were inverted. Abraham said to the rich man, “Remember that during your life you received your good things, just as Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here, while you are in agony” (Luke 16:25). In the context of Jesus’ diatribe with the Pharisees in Luke 15-16, Abraham’s statements in the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus reinforced what Jesus taught about money and salvation history. Jesus’ point was that the Pharisees were guilty by their own standard; they used the Old Testament as an excuse for their greed and selfishness. Since the Pharisees had rejected the Old Testament pointers to Jesus, they would certainly not accept the witness of His resurrection.

In Luke 9:51-19:40 the author recounted Jesus’ teaching as He approached Jerusalem for the last time. Of all the controversies surrounding Jesus’ ministry, none surpassed the discontinuity between Jesus and the religious leaders of Israel regarding the Sabbath. According to Jesus, godliness was not manifested by what Israelites refrained from doing on the seventh day, but by what His followers were to practice each day: humility before all, and commitment to Him. Jesus lamented Jerusalem’s stubborn opposition to God’s word and instructed His disciples in the humility and devotion that would characterize all who would enjoy the eschatological banquet. In Luke 13-14, Jesus depicted His ministry as the grid for interpreting the narrative of Scripture.

(1) In Luke 13:16 and 28, Jesus referenced the patriarchs as participants in the kingdom of God. In Genesis 12 and 15, God expressed His promise to Abraham, assuring Abraham land and lineage. Through Abraham, God promised to bless the nations. When Abraham and Sarah were past the age of childbearing, God gave them a son, Isaac (Gen 21:1-7). Isaac fathered Esau and Jacob by his wife Rebekah, and the Lord chose Jacob to continue the line of blessing from Isaac and Abraham (Gen 25:19-26:6). When Jesus healed the crippled woman in one of the Galilean synagogues on the Sabbath, the leader of the synagogue was indignant with Jesus for working on Israel’s sacred day. Jesus justified His act of kindness toward the woman based on the fact that she was a descendant of Abraham (Luke 13:16). Later when someone in the crowds following Jesus asked Him if there were only a few being saved, Jesus answered, “Make every effort to enter through the narrow door, because I tell you, many will try to enter and won’t be able” (Luke 13:24). Jesus taught that works of righteousness are consistent with the way of salvation, concluding that at the judgement the unrighteous would be in the place of despair (Matt 8:11-12//Luke 13:28-29). From the realm of torment, the unrighteous would see “Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and all the prophets in the kingdom of God” (Luke 13:28).

(2) In Luke 13:10-17 and 14:1-6, Jesus healed the diseased on the Sabbath. Jesus’ power and mercy expressed toward the woman who was crippled for eighteen years in Luke 13:10-17 anticipated Jesus’ healing of the man with dropsy in Luke 14:1-6. Based upon the commands in Leviticus 13-14, the discharge of fluid from this man’s body would have made him unclean. Yet, somehow, he found his way into a Pharisee’s house on the Sabbath when the Pharisee was hosting Jesus for a meal. The Jewish leadership watched to see if Jesus would heal the man—on the Sabbath. Jesus did, and taught that the Sabbath had a different function in the kingdom of God than what was generally accepted by the Jewish leadership. God jealously instituted the Sabbath to test Israel’s reliance upon Him. As the Israelites rested from their work and were yet satisfied, other nations would ask Israel about the Lord and want the Lord to be their God (Exod 16:1-30; Num 15:32-36; Deut 4:1-8; 5:12-15). Jesus’ problem with the Pharisees was not that they had too high a view of the Sabbath, but their understanding of the Sabbath was insufficient. Earlier in Luke’s account, Jesus had permitted His disciples to pick grain and eat on the Sabbath (Matt 12:1-8//Mark 2:23-26//Luke 6:1-5), declaring Himself the “Lord of the Sabbath” (Luke 6:5).

(3) In Luke 13:35, Jesus quoted Ps 118:26 to proclaim His messianic authority in pronouncing the destruction and restoration of Jerusalem. Jerusalem was the city where the royal figure Melchizedek served as priest to God Most High (Gen 14:17-20). Jerusalem was the city of David, where the Lord established Israel’s temple and monarchy (1 Chron 21:18-22:1; Pss 2:6; 48:2; 137:3). Jerusalem and the temple became polluted by Israel’s idolatry. God condemned the city to destruction by Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kgs 24:10-12) according to the words of the prophets like Jeremiah (Jer 1:15; 5:1-13; 7:1-11). Jesus portrayed Himself as one of the prophets Israel rejected (Luke 13:34) and pronounced that the city would be destroyed. But Jesus’ word of condemnation would not be His last. Jesus took up Ps 118:26, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord,” to prophesy the chorus the people would sing when they recognized His glory. Psalm 118 is a song of victory for the Lord’s saving power over Jerusalem despite the fact that the city had been rejected and attacked by the surrounding nations. The One coming in the name of the Lord would bring final deliverance.

Luke was a skilled and organized writer. He reported the events of Jesus’ life with clarity and sophistication. In Luke 11-12, Luke noted how Jesus used the Old Testament autobiographically to announce that the history of Israel reached its zenith in His ministry.

(1) In Luke 11:29-32, Jesus compared Himself to Jonah and Solomon to rebuke those who demanded a sign from Him. Jesus condemned the generation of His day because they continually sought a sign that He was the Messiah—even though He performed many miracles in their presence (Matt 12:39-42//Luke 11:29-32). To them He promised the sign of Jonah, saying, “For just as Jonah became a sign to the people of Nineveh, so also the Son of Man will be to this generation” (Luke 11:30). Jonah was three days in the fish before preaching to Nineveh, and Jesus would be three days in the tomb. While the fish was sent to keep Jonah alive, the sign of Jesus was greater—He died and was raised to life. No sign could authenticate Jesus’ claims to be the Messiah more than His death and resurrection. If the crowds and Jewish leadership would not believe the empty tomb, no other sign would be given them. Yet Jesus knew the hard-heartedness of the day. Since the Jewish leadership rejected Him, while the wicked city of Nineveh repented at the words of Jonah, “In 40 days Nineveh will be overthrown!” (Jonah 3:4), the people of Nineveh would rise up in condemnation of those who rejected the greater ministry of Jesus. Likewise, since the queen of Sheba traveled a great distance to hear the wisdom of Solomon (1 Kgs 10:1)—and Jesus’ generation rejected His superior wisdom—at the judgment she would rise up and condemn the hardness of those who rejected Jesus.

(2) In Luke 11:47-51, Jesus denounced the Pharisees for acting consistently with their fathers, those who had killed the prophets like Abel and Zechariah. In Gen 4:8, Cain killed his younger brother Abel in a jealous rage. When the Lord confronted Cain, He told the murderer that Abel’s blood cried out from the ground (Gen 4:10). Since Abel died unjustly, he became a martyr, a prophet of righteousness. Toward the end of his life, King Joash of Judah turned from the Lord (2 Chron 24:15-22). Zechariah son of Jehoiada the priest acted as a prophet and confronted Joash, and the king responded by having Zechariah stoned in the courtyard of the temple (2 Chron 24:21). Throughout Israel’s history, from the time of Abel to Zechariah, Israel rejected the prophets. Because the Pharisees had rejected Him, Jesus inferred that it was as if His opponents were actually participating with their forefathers in the persecution of all the prophets (Matt 23:34-36//Luke 11:49-51).

(3) In Luke 12:53, Jesus cited Mic 7:6 to inform His disciples that their devotion to His kingdom would cause separation in some of their closest relationships. Micah confronted Israel’s unfaithfulness to the Lord and one other. In Mic 7:6, the prophet lamented the social decay in Judah—so fractured was the nation that no one could be considered a loyal friend, not even those in one’s family. While Micah argued that the divisiveness of his day was the result of unfaithfulness to the Lord, Jesus said that all who are faithful to Him would have to endure loss of relationships as close associates and family turned from following Him (Matt 10:34-36//Luke 12:49-53). Jesus did not come to bring peace to all human relationships, but peace between God and His people—which would cause many to oppose His followers and separate from them. “They will be divided,” Jesus said, “father against son, son against father, mother against daughter, daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law” (Luke 12:53).

Jesus’ mission in Luke 9-10 revealed that as He turned His attention toward Jerusalem, He did so in light of the record of redemptive history in the Old Testament. He was not a radical, esoteric figure, but One who brought to culmination God’s earlier acts of revelation in the Old Testament.

(1) In Luke 9:28-36, Jesus was transfigured before some of the disciples and spoke with Moses and Elijah—prophets who spoke for God and performed miracles in the Old Testament. The account of the Transfiguration (Matt 17:1-8//Mark 9:2-8//Luke 9:28-36) set forth Jesus’ unique place in salvation history. When Peter, John, and James saw the change in Jesus’ appearance, Luke reported that they also saw Moses and Elijah talking with Jesus. The three were not discussing Moses’ leadership in the exodus (Exodus 12-15) or Elijah’s great acts like the defeat of the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18), but Jesus’ departure that would take place via the cross in Jerusalem (Luke 9:31). The voice from heaven confirmed for Peter, John, and James that Jesus was God’s Son, the Chosen One whose ministry fulfilled all that Moses and Elijah had done in God’s name.

(2) In Luke 9:51, Jesus’ mission toward Jerusalem echoed the significance of the city of David in the Old Testament. Melchizedek, king of Jerusalem, visited Abraham and received a tithe of the spoils of war from the patriarch (Gen 14:17-20). Jerusalem was the city of David, the place that David established as the center of Israel’s religious and civic life (1 Chron 21:18-22:1; Pss 2:6; 48:2; 137:3; Zech 9:9). But after the days of David, Jerusalem descended into an idolatrous abode—a place hardened to God’s prophetic word and destined for destruction (2 Kgs 24:10-12; Jer 1:15; 5:1-13; 7:1-11). Jesus understood Himself to be in the tradition of the rejected prophets, those whom Jerusalem loathed. Luke wrote, “When the days were coming to a close for Him to be taken up, He determined to journey to Jerusalem” (Luke 9:51). Jesus sent seventy disciples to journey south ahead of Him, preparing the towns and villages for His ascent to Jerusalem. He was so sure that Jewish leadership would seize Him there that when He was warned along the way that Herod Antipas, the iron-fisted governor of Galilee, wished to kill Him. Jesus replied, “I must travel today, tomorrow, and the next day, because it is not possible for a prophet to perish outside of Jerusalem!” (Luke 13:33). If the Jewish leadership in Jerusalem had a chance to get Jesus, then even the danger of Herod Antipas would have to take second place. As Jesus arrived in Jerusalem to die, He wept over the city and pronounced judgement against it (Luke 19:41-44).

(3) In Luke 10:27, an expert in the law said that Deut 6:5 and Lev 19:18 were the commandments that led to eternal life. After stating the Ten Commandments in Deuteronomy 5, Moses told Israel that they were to love God with all of their life (Deut 6:5). In Leviticus 19, Moses prescribed various laws for Israelite purity and justice. As the people of Israel showed love for one another (Lev 19:18), they would reflect God’s holiness and purity in the Promised Land. Jesus’ discussion with an expert in the law (Matt 22:34-40//Mark 12:28-34//Luke 10:25-28) demonstrated His new, advanced proclamation of the way of salvation. This lawyer came to Jesus asking what he needed to do to inherit eternal life. When Jesus asked him how he understood the law, the lawyer answered that the way of salvation was found in love for God and love for one’s neighbor, in accord with Deut 6:5 and Lev 19:18. Jesus affirmed the man’s analysis of the way of salvation. But the lawyer wanted to justify himself and asked Jesus to define who qualified as a neighbor. The lawyer’s query prompted Jesus to tell the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37). Jesus’ point with the parable was that the lawyer needed to be more concerned with being merciful to those in need around him than wondering who qualified as his neighbor. The lawyer appeared to be near salvation, but Jesus exposed the lawyer’s self-righteousness and lack of love toward the needy around him.