Category: <span>Old Testament</span>

While the early days of Saul’s reign were effective, after the Israelites grew cowardly and deserted before the Philistines, the king took matters into his own hands. He could no longer wait on Samuel to arrive and offer the burnt offerings and fellowship offerings before going to battle. He hastily offered them himself, in disobedience of the Lord’s command. Samuel arrived just after Saul finished with the sacrifices, and he told the king that the Lord would replace him with a man loyal to Him (1 Sam 13:14).

Samuel’s word leaves the reader wondering “Who will this one be? When will he arrive and deliver Israel from their enemies?” The answer comes sooner rather than later. Saul, in an uncharacteristically mellow attack on the Amalekites, spared their king and the best of the plunder. This was another act of unfaithfulness and proved grounds for dismissal from the throne.

In 1 Samuel 15, there is a recognizable sequence to Saul’s demise. The Lord commanded Saul to “attack the Amalekites and completely destroy everything they have. Do not spare them. Kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys” (1 Sam 15:3). Saul struck the Amalekites and destroyed “all the worthless and unwanted things” (1 Sam 15:9a), but, “spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, cattle, and fatlings, as well as the young rams and the best of everything else” (1 Sam 15:9b). From the best of these things, the Amalekites could eventually repopulate and survive—defying the will of the Lord. Further displaying his true colors, Saul set up a monument to himself in Carmel (1 Sam 15:12).

Samuel confronted Saul, saying he had done “evil in the LORD’s sight” (1 Sam 15:19) by sparing the best sheep and cattle for sacrifice. Samuel’s interrogation of Saul was pointed, “Does the LORD take pleasure in burnt offerings and sacrifices as much as in obeying the LORD?…Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, He has rejected you as king” (1 Sam 15:22-23). Saul, semi-repentant, wanted Samuel to yet accompany him for worship, which could have served as an affirmation to the people that Saul’s rule was secure (1 Sam 15:24). After a visual display that Saul’s reign was over, Samuel returned with him, and there “hacked Agag to pieces before the LORD” (1 Sam 15:33).

Because Saul was zealous for personal glory, God simply replaced him with someone who would be more faithful (1 Samuel 16). The Lord sent Samuel to Jesse in Bethlehem, saying, “I have selected a king from his sons” (1 Sam 16:1). In the end, all discovered that the Lord had chosen the youngest, David, a healthy and handsome young man, who was out tending the sheep (1 Sam 16:11-12). Ironically, David soon found himself ministering in Saul’s court as a musician whose harp could relieve Saul of the evil spirit the Lord had sent upon him (1 Sam 16:14-23). There young David observed life in the palace of Israel’s king and learned military protocol (1 Sam 16:21)—schooling that would soon prove invaluable.

The anointing of David casts a long shadow in God’s unfolding redemptive plan. In Paul’s first recorded sermon in Acts, he surveyed high points of the Old Testament, including 1 Samuel 15-16, in order to help his listeners in Pisidian Antioch understand Jesus in light of what God had done for His people in the past. Paul noted that during the ministry of Samuel, the people had asked for a king and the Lord gave them Saul (Acts 13:21). “After removing him,” Paul continued, “He raised up David as their king, of whom He testified: ‘I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after My heart, who will carry out all My will’” (Acts 13:22). From Paul’s reference to 1 Sam 15:23, 26 and 16:13, the apostle turned straightaway to testify about Jesus, proclaiming that from David’s line, “according to the promise, God brought the Savior, Jesus, to Israel” (Acts 13:23).

1 Samuel with Select Psalms and Proverbs Commentary Old Testament

These chapters of 1 Samuel move rapidly from jubilation to humiliation. Saul went from following the direction of the Spirit to being dominated by selfish ambition. Though Israel’s choice of a king brought temporal success, the people of Israel soon discovered that the character of their king was not good enough for God.

Though Israel enjoyed temporal success through Saul’s deliverance of Jabesh-gilead (1 Sam 11:1-11), that success would not last. When the message of the Ammonite invasion reached Saul, “the Spirit of God suddenly took control of him, and his anger burned furiously” (1 Sam 11:6). Saul warned Israel to join him in fighting the Ammonites or face the consequences of his wrath (1 Sam 11:7). Saul was so confident in the Lord and the troops that he instructed messengers, “Tell this to the men of Jabesh-gilead: ‘Deliverance will be yours tomorrow by the time the sun is hot’” (1 Sam 11:9). Israel celebrated their king’s military leadership, and “all the people went to Gilgal, and there in the LORD’s presence they made Saul king. They sacrificed fellowship offerings in the LORD’s presence and Saul and all the men of Israel greatly rejoiced” (1 Sam 11:15).

Yet, in his farewell address in 1 Samuel 12, Samuel reminded Israel that their choice of a human king would result in potential dangers. After reviewing Israel’s history from the time Jacob went to Egypt to the point when Israel asked for a king, Samuel confronted Israel’s motive in wanting a human king to reign over them (1 Sam 12:12). Samuel identified Israel’s motive in wanting a king: not only so that they would “be like all the other nations,” but further so that “our king will…fight our battles” (1 Sam 8:20). Israel wanted a human king because they were afraid. They thought God was no longer up to the task of conquering the remaining kings of Canaan. This line of thinking was so grievous to Samuel and the Lord that the Lord sent a great storm upon the people of Israel so that they would acknowledge their sin and again fear Him (1 Sam 12:16-19).

As Samuel had prophesied, the Lord dismissed Saul from his role as Israel’s king (1 Sam 13-14). Israel thought having a human king would ease their fear of the surrounding nations (1 Sam 8:19-20; 12:12; contra Ps 44:1-8). Even though they had Saul reigning over them, when the Philistines approached for battle, “the men of Israel saw that they were in trouble because the troops were in a difficult situation” (1 Sam 13:6a). Israel’s fear of the Philistines also led Saul to act unfaithfully and as a result his reign would not endure (1 Sam 13:14). Saul’s desire for vengeance, which ultimately cost him the throne, led him to make a rash vow against any of his warriors who ate food that day (1 Sam 14:24). Sadly, “Jonathan had not heard his father make the troops swear the oath” (1 Sam 14:27) and ate some wild honey. In the end, the Israelites recognized that the honey was in fact the means of “God’s help” (1 Sam 14:45) and they spared Jonathan from Saul’s wrath.

When Samuel confronted Saul with the news that he would not endure as king, he said, “You have not kept the command which the LORD your God gave you…The LORD has found a man loyal to Him, and the LORD has appointed him as ruler over His people, because you have not done what the LORD commanded” (1 Sam 13:13-14). In the immediate context, this “loyal man” was David, Jesse’s youngest son (1 Sam 16:11-13). David courageously defeated Goliath (1 Samuel 17) and provided Israel superb military leadership (2 Samuel 8-10//1 Chronicles 18-20). Nonetheless, even David’s reign would be scarred by infidelity (2 Samuel 11) and pride (2 Samuel 24//1 Chronicles 21). In the storyline of Scripture, only Jesus could fulfill the ideal of Israel’s warrior king. From the outset of His ministry, Jesus battled the Devil, the ultimate enemy of not just Israel but all of humanity. Jesus first defeated the Devil by enduring his temptations in the desert (Matt 4:1-11//Mark 1:12-13//Luke 4:1-13). When Jesus headed toward the cross, He announced, “Now the ruler of this world will be cast out” (John 12:31). There Jesus triumphed over the Devil finally and decisively, forgiving the sins of God’s people and removing the Devil’s weaponry of condemnation and death (Heb 2:14-15).

1 Samuel with Select Psalms and Proverbs Commentary Old Testament

These chapters recall themes established in the initial scenes of 1 Samuel: the relationship between the ark of the covenant and the Lord’s presence and concerns about who would provide leadership for Israel. Despite the fact that the Philistines had captured the ark, the Lord was yet with His people. But they were dissatisfied with God’s reign and implored Samuel to give them a human king so that they could be like their pagan neighbors.

After the events in 1 Samuel 1-4, Israel may have doubted the potency of the Lord’s presence in the ark of the covenant (1 Sam 4:1-11). The Philistines’ urgent desire to be rid of the ark showed that the Lord was yet present between the cherubim (1 Sam 5:1-6:18). The Philistines felt so threatened that they “summoned the priests and the diviners and pleaded, ‘What should we do with the ark of the LORD? Tell us how we can send it back to its place’” (1 Sam 6:1-2). These pagans surmised that the Lord of Israel was a God like theirs and formulated a plan for returning the ark to Israel (1 Sam 6:3-12).

When the Israelites witnessed the ark, “they were overjoyed to see it’ (1 Sam 6:13). Yet when the men of Bethshemesh “looked inside the ark” (1 Sam 6:19), despising God’s holiness, the Lord struck them with a plague. Samuel implored the people to rid themselves of idolatry, saying, “Dedicate yourselves to the LORD, and worship only Him. Then He will rescue you from the hand of the Philistines” (1 Sam 7:3). When the Philistines heard that the return of the ark had caused a revival to break out amongst Israel at Mizpah, they marched up to attack. Although Israel was fearful, Samuel’s petition prevailed and “the LORD thundered loudly against the Philistines that day and threw them into such confusion that they fled before Israel” (1 Sam 7:10).

Samuel’s ardent spiritual leadership in Israel declined as he aged (1 Sam 8:1-5). This sad resemblance to the family of Eli had a devastating effect upon the people of God and the author notes that, “All the elders of Israel gathered together and went to Samuel at Ramah. They said to him, ‘Look, you are old, and your sons do not follow your example. Therefore, appoint a king to judge us the same as all the other nations have” (1 Sam 8:4-5). But the Lord consoled Samuel saying, “They have not rejected you; they have rejected Me as their king. They are doing the same thing to you that they have done to Me, since the day I brought them out of Egypt until this day, abandoning Me and worshiping other gods” (1 Sam 8:7-8). Samuel warned the people that if they thus rejected the Lord, they should be aware of the way that a king might abuse them (1 Sam 8:9-17).

Despite Samuel’s warnings, the people stubbornly replied, “We must have a king over us. Then we’ll be like all the other nations: our king will judge us, go out before us, and fight our battles” (1 Sam 8:19-20). The whole of 1 Samuel 9 and most of 1 Samuel 10 detail how Saul was chosen as king. The author did not hide the fact that Israel’s desire to be like their neighbors was rooted in their dissatisfaction with the Lord.

Israel longed for a human king, and a human king they got. Saul’s reign followed the pattern Samuel predicted and the people suffered for it. While David and Solomon would eventually display divine characteristics in their respective reigns, in the storyline of Scripture only Jesus Christ provides the kind of protection and significance that Israel longed for in the latter days of Samuel. The angel Gabriel announced to Mary that her Son would sit on the throne of David (Luke 1:32) and the wise men from the east inquired of Herod where the king of the Jews would be born (Matt 2:2). Throughout His life, Jesus demonstrated that He was a different kind of king. Jesus’ kingdom was not of this world, as He told Pilate just before Pilate sentenced Jesus to be crucified (John 18:36). Ultimately, Israel’s idolatry led them to reject God’s rule over them. Perhaps that is why John, after writing in detail about Jesus Christ in 1 John 5, writes, “Little children, guard yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).

1 Samuel with Select Psalms and Proverbs Commentary Old Testament

The concluding scenes of the book of Judges emphasize the void of godly leadership in Israel. The first four chapters of 1 Samuel set out an initial solution. The Lord raised up Samuel as His prophet to speak His word and regulate worship. As the narrative of 1 and 2 Samuel progresses, the spiritual vitality of both Samuel and David provide the stability necessary for Israel to be successful in the land.

The extensive account of Hannah’s barrenness in 1 Samuel 1 serves to reinforce a pattern of the Old Testament: the ability to conceive children comes from the Lord. Thus Hannah vowed, “LORD of Hosts, if You will take notice of your servant’s affliction, remember and not forget me, and give Your servant a son, I will give him to the LORD all the days of his life, and his hair will never be cut” (1 Sam 1:11). Hannah fulfilled her vow by presenting Samuel to the Lord at Shiloh (1 Sam 1:24). The theology of Hannah’s prayer of victory (1 Sam 2:1-11) is reflected by the Psalmist who wrote: “He raises the poor from the dust and lifts the needy from the garbage pile…He gives the childless woman a household, making her the joyful mother of children. Hallelujah!” (Ps 113:7, 9).

While the boy Samuel “served the LORD in the presence of Eli the priest” (1 Sam 2:11), “Eli’s sons were wicked men; they had no regard for the LORD or for the priests share of the sacrifices from the people” (1 Sam 2:12). The Lord’s call on Samuel was evident (1 Sam 3:1-18), even giving Samuel boldness to announce to Eli that Eli’s family would be condemned. First Samuel 3:19-20 adds, “Samuel grew, and the LORD was with him and let nothing he said prove false. All Israel from Dan to Beersheba knew that Samuel was a confirmed prophet of the LORD.”

The narrative of 1 Samuel 4 moves the reader’s attention from the events at Shiloh westward to the land of the Philistines. There the Israelites engaged their enemies but were defeated (1 Sam 4:2). Thinking the ark of the Lord’s covenant a relic that could ensure a more favorable outcome against their foes, Israel—under the immoral leadership of Hophni and Phinehas—brought the ark from Shiloh to their camp at Ebenezer (1 Sam 4:3-4). The Philistines defeated Israel, taking the ark as spoil (1 Sam 4:5-11). The remainder of 1 Samuel 4 reveals the truthfulness of Samuel’s word to Eli shortly after Samuel’s call experience: Eli died, and his daughter-in-law, the wife of Phinehas, died giving birth to a son (1 Sam 4:12-20). She named her son Ichabod saying, “The glory has departed from Israel…because the ark of God has been captured” (1 Sam 4:22).

The childbirth narratives in 1 Samuel 1-4 provide a rubric for understanding the glory of God in the storyline of Scripture. The countenance of Eli’s daughter-in-law in 1 Sam 4:19-22, and the choice of a name for her son, inform the reader that for many Israelites the glory of God was related to the ark of the covenant. Once it had been captured, they understood that God’s special care for the nation had likewise been taken captive by the Philistines.

God’s glory departed from Israel even after He had answered Hannah’s prayer for a son and set Samuel apart as a prophet. Hannah’s prayer and Samuel’s ministry in 1 Samuel 1-3 foreshadow the coming of Jesus Christ, who is the glory of God become man. When the angel Gabriel told Mary that she would conceive and give birth to Jesus, she sang a song of praise (Luke 1:46-55) that echoes Hannah’s song in 1 Sam 2:1-11. Like Hannah, Mary rejoiced in God for looking upon the humble state of His people and raising the lowly in triumph over their enemies. But Mary’s song goes beyond Hannah’s, itself expressing the storyline of Scripture. Mary sang of God’s mercy upon Abraham and his descendants (Luke 1:54-55). When Gabriel announced to Mary that she was favored of God to give birth to Jesus, the angel told her that her Son would be great, sitting on the throne of His father David and ruling over the house of Jacob eternally (Luke 1:32-33). It is no wonder then that when Jesus was born, the heavenly angels appeared to the shepherds singing, “Glory to God in the highest heaven” (Luke 2:14). Jesus, like Samuel (1 Sam 2:26), grew in favor with God and men (Luke 2:52) but only Jesus was God’s Son, able to identify the temple in Jerusalem as His Father’s house (Luke 2:49).

1 Samuel with Select Psalms and Proverbs Commentary Old Testament

The book of Ruth has long been one of the most beloved short stories of the Church. Its literary features include parallelism, poetry, and vivid characterization. The book of Ruth, whose events most likely follow immediately after those recorded in the book of Judges (Ruth 1:1), is the account of a non-Israelite woman who showed more devotion and faithfulness to the Lord and His people than even many of the Judges who preceded her. Ruth was mightier than Samson.

The opening scene of the book of Ruth details several crises that set the stage for the drama of the story. To survive, Elimelech took his wife Naomi and his family to Moab because of a severe famine that had come upon the land (Ruth 1:1). While living in Moab, Elimelech and his two sons died. As a result, “Naomi was left without her two children and without her husband” (Ruth 1:5). Though the famine ceased in Canaan and the women were able to return home, they had no male security for the voyage or provision once they arrived (Ruth 1:6-9). Read against the backdrop of the Levite’s concubine in Gibeah (see Judges 19), one recognizes the degree of Naomi’s concern for the well-being of her family. Naomi’s daughter-in-law, Orpah, decided to return to her own county and the idolatry of Moab (Ruth 1:4, 13, 15). Ruth, however, remained steadfast in commitment to Naomi—and to the God of Israel—saying, “Where you die, I will die, and there I will be buried. May the LORD do this to me, and even more, if anything but death separates you and me” (Ruth 1:17).

The end of Ruth 1 provides the important detail that Naomi and Ruth “arrived in Bethlehem at the beginning of the barley harvest” (Ruth 1:22). The author wastes no time in presenting Boaz as God’s instrument of provision for Ruth and her mother-in-law. When Boaz heard of Ruth’s commitment to Naomi, even forsaking her family in Moab (Ruth 2:11), he prayed in her hearing, “May the LORD reward you for what you have done, and may you receive a full reward from the LORD God of Israel, under whose wings you have come for refuge” (Ruth 2:12). When Boaz heard of Ruth’s desire that he redeem her, he pledged, “I will do for you whatever you say, since all the people in my town know that you are a woman of noble character…but there is a redeemer closer than I am” (Ruth 3:11-12). Boaz’s desire to care for Ruth is apparent in his commitment to follow legal procedure for her redemption (Ruth 4:1-10).

When Boaz was cleared to redeem Ruth and bring her into his family, the elders of Bethlehem prayed in his hearing, “May the LORD make the woman who is entering your house like Rachel and Leah, who together built the house of Israel” (Ruth 4:11). The text straightaway announces the fulfillment of their prayer: “Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife. When he was intimate with her, the LORD enabled her to conceive, and she gave birth to a son” (Ruth 4:13).

While the plot of the story already has a magnificent conclusion, the author points to the far-reaching implications of Boaz and Ruth’s union. Their son Obed “was the father of Jesse, the father of David” (Ruth 4:17). His words provide a framework for understanding Scripture’s narrative of redemption in Christ. From the line of David came Jesus Christ, the One who redeemed all nations. In Matthew’s account of Jesus’ genealogy, he wrote, “Salmon fathered Boaz by Rahab, Boaz fathered Obed by Ruth, Obed fathered Jesse, and Jesse fathered King David” (Matt 1:5-6). David was known as king—and the angel Gabriel wanted Mary to think of Jesus as a king too. He told Mary that God would give the baby in her womb the throne of His father David and that that baby would have an eternal reign (Luke 1:32-33). Jesus’ eternal, royal reign was inaugurated in His resurrection, as Paul detailed at the outset of Romans where he noted that Jesus descended from David according to the flesh but was shown to be God’s Son by His resurrection (Rom 1:3-4).

Commentary Old Testament Ruth

Often writers wish to save their most telling ideas for the end of their composition. The author of Judges seems to have followed suit. Judges 19-21 reveals that while Israel finally united to address the covenant decay that had characterized the nation since the death of Joshua, even their best efforts at justice were little more than each man doing whatever he wanted (Judg 21:25).

The description of the Levite and his concubine in Judges 19 displays the depth of depravity in Israel. When the Levite was able to take his concubine and depart for his home to the north in Ephraim (Judg 19:1), the Levite insisted that they “not stop at a foreign city where there are no Israelites” (Judg 19:12). Their hopes for hospitality were delayed until an old man vigorously took them in (Judg 19:13-21). But “all of a sudden, perverted men of the city surrounded the house and beat on the door” (Judg 19:22). To allow the peace of the meal to continue, the Levite casually tossed his concubine to the mongrels; it would be her last night. The Levite’s command to her limp body, “Get up…let’s go” (Judg 19:28), confirmed that despite earlier hints of genuine affection for the woman, his ethics were on par with the men of the Gibeah who had violated her all night long. When the Levite realized that such a thing should not be done among God’s people, he sought a response from the tribes of Israel (Judg 19:29-30).

In Judges 20, the author describes how the tribes responded to the Levite’s inquiry. The text is marked by Israel’s coherent response. “All the people stood united” (Judg 20:8) and they “went to Bethel, and inquired of God” (Judg 20:18). Upon the Lord’s assurance that He would hand the Benjamites over to them, Israel set up an intricate ambush against Gibeah (Judg 20:29-45); and “the LORD defeated Benjamin in the presence of Israel, and on that day the Israelites slaughtered 25,100 men of Benjamin” (Judg 20:35). Israel spared none of the inhabitants of Gibeah (Judg 20:46-48). But the excessive slaughter had produced an unexpected result: an entire tribe had been nearly destroyed and the people cried out to the Lord, “Why, LORD God of Israel, has it occurred that one tribe is missing in Israel today?” (Judg 21:3). The matter was complicated by the fact that at Mizpah the Israelites vowed to restrict the men of Benjamin from taking a wife from outside of his own tribe (Judg 21:1, 18). The united tribes of Israel made two attempts to fix the problem. First, they provided the surviving Benjamite men with the virgins of Jabesh-gilead (Judg 21:6-14). Yet, even this violent scheme proved ineffective as 200 of the 600 Benjamite fugitives (see Judg 20:47) remained bachelors. They then encouraged these 200 Benjamites to take hostage the women of Shiloh and make wives of them (Judg 21:15-23). The book of Judges fades to black as “each of the Israelites returned…to his own tribe and family…to his own inheritance. In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did whatever he wanted” (Judg 21:24-25).

Israel had the land but they failed to keep the law. In the storyline of Scripture, the book of Judges is the initial fulfillment of the prophecies of both Moses and Joshua. On the plains of Moab, Moses warned, “If your heart turns away and you do not listen and you are led astray to bow down to other gods and worship them, I tell you today that you will certainly perish and will not live long in the land you are entering to possess across the Jordan” (Deut 30:17-18). Joshua said, “If you turn away and cling to the rest of these nations remaining among you, and if you intermarry or associate with them and they with you, know for certain that the LORD your God will not continue to drive these nations out before you. They will become a snare and a trap for you” (Josh 23: 12-13). Moses prophesied that only when God circumcised the hearts of the people of Israel would they heed His word (Deut 30:1-6). After Christ’s death, resurrection, and ascension this change of heart is said to be accomplished by the Holy Spirit. Paul wrote to the Romans, “A person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart—by the Spirit, not the letter (of the law)” (Rom 2:9).

Commentary Judges Old Testament

The author of Judges was not content to blandly state the waywardness of God’s people. He arranged his material in such a way as to display the degree of shameful behavior that characterized Israel. During the period of the Judges, few were faithful to the law.

The initial description of Micah’s household magnifies what the author of Judges emphasized in the story of Jephthah in Judges 11. Self-serving religious activity is often characterized by attempts to coerce God. In Judges 17, Micah and his mother attempted to manipulate God not through a rash vow but by means of religious objects and institutions. When Micah’s mother received 1,100 pieces of silver, she did what was right in her own eyes saying, “I personally consecrate the silver to the LORD for my son’s benefit to make a carved image overlaid with silver” (Judg 17:3). She made an idol to the Lord—utter disregard for the law. But Micah’s unfaithfulness went further. He “had a shrine, and he made an ephod and household idols, and installed one of his sons to be his priest” (Judg 17:5). With this pseudo-religious rubric in place, when a wandering Levite inquired of Micah if he could stay with him, Micah hired the Levite as his own private household priest (Judg 17:7-12). Micah said, “Now I know that the LORD will be good to me, because a Levite has become my priest” (Judg 17:13).

But Micah would soon discover that idols and a priest were no substitute for true devotion to God. Since Micah had hired his priest, his priest was for hire. Judges 18 records that when the Danites sent spies to explore the land to the north and came to the hill country of Ephraim, they stayed at Micah’s house. They recognized the southern accent of the Levite from Judah who was serving as Micah’s personal priest (Judg 18:2-4). When the Danites arose to overtake Laish, they plundered Micah of his idols and his priest (Judg 18:11-17). The Levite was persuaded, even pleased, by the Danites’ appeal when he heard them say, “Come with us and be a father and a priest to us. Is it better for you to be a priest for the house of one person or for you to be a priest for a tribe and family in Israel?” (Judg 18:19). Everyone in Israel was practicing their religion in a way that seemed right in their own eyes.

The story of Micah and his priest in Judges 17-18 reveals that many in Israel thought God’s blessing could be secured by (partial) conformity to various elements of their cultic system, like having a Levite as a household priest. Some in the days of the New Testament held to these practices, especially circumcision and Sabbath keeping, in hopes of earning God’s favor and securing temporary blessings based upon superstition. The New Testament writers argued that these religious practices were not an end in themselves but part of the broader storyline of Scripture that unfolds God’s redemptive work in Christ.

(1) Paul exhorted the Colossians, “Be careful that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deceit based on human tradition, based on the elemental forces of the world, and not based on Christ” (Col 2:8).

(2) The author of Hebrews wrote, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Don’t be led astray by various kinds of strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be established by grace and not by foods, since those involved in them have not benefited” (Heb 13:8-9).

Commentary Judges Old Testament

After the Lord submitted Israel to the will of the Philistines for forty years, He raised up Samson to deliver His people. Samson’s leadership points to the fact that God’s purposes to establish His corporate people go beyond, and often conspicuously encompasses, the moral failure of those whom He has called to lead. While the Lord used Samson mightily, Samson’s irreverence before Delilah earned him the just condemnation of one who had so carelessly regarded the special call of a Nazirite.

Judges 13 begins with the angelic announcement that Manoah and his wife would have a son, Samson. The proclamation that Samson would “begin to deliver Israel from the power of the Philistines” (Judg 13:5) was inextricably linked to the command that his parents raise him to be a Nazirite from birth. Samson’s parents were faithful and from his early days, “the Sprit of the LORD began to direct him in the Camp of Dan, between Zorah and Eshtaol” (Judg 13:25).

The narrative of Judges 14-15 reveals that Samson’s ways fell short of one wholly devoted to the Lord. Samson’s initial moral blemish involved lust for women (Judg 14:1-2). Then Samson ate honey from a dead animal (Judg 14:8-10), a clear violation of Samson’s Nazirite commitment (see Numbers 6). Samson was arrogant in his defiance of the Nazarite vow, enticing the Philistines with a riddle and wager as to what he had done (Judg 14:12-18). Yet, as is the case throughout the narrative of the Old Testament, God’s activity was compatible with even Samson’s moral lapse. Judges 14:4 records that Samson’s lust for a Philistine wife was actually “from the LORD” (Judg 14:4; see also Gen 50:20).

Nonetheless, Samson’s persistent lust would eventually lead to his demise (Judges 16). Samson’s love for Delilah was so strong that it did not wane even after several episodes where she employed trickery to discover the source of his strength (Judg 16:6-15). Finally, in an act of irreverence, Samson revealed to Delilah, “My hair has never been cut, because I am a Nazirite to God from birth. If I am shaved, my strength will leave me” (Judg 16:17). Samson would soon discover that—for the first time—“the LORD had left him” (Judg 16:20). Samson lost not only his strength but also his sight and his dignity (Judg 16:20-27). In the end, the Lord again worked on behalf of His people despite the failures of Samson, and thousands of Philistines were killed (Judg 16:28-30).

Samson’s behavior was typical of Israel in the time of the Judges. He did whatever he wanted (Judg 21:25). Despite Samson’s moral weakness, the Spirit of the Lord came upon him to deliver Israel from the Philistines (Judg 14:6, 19; 15:14). Samson, like Othniel (Judg 3:10), Gideon (Judg 6:34), and Jephthah (Judg 11:29), received aid from the Spirit for the work God had planned for him. Likewise, the Spirit of God empowered both Saul (1 Sam 10:6, 10; 16:14) and David (1 Sam 16:13; 2 Sam 23:2) for leadership. During Israel’s occupation of Canaan, the ministry of the Spirit was enjoyed primarily by those called to positions of leadership. After the coming of Christ, the ministry of the Spirit is more pervasive in the community of believers invigorating each member for ministry. The same Spirit who empowered Israel’s leaders for their work also enables believers for service in their local churches and in the world. To the Corinthians, Paul wrote, “A manifestation of the Spirit is given to each person to produce what is beneficial…one and the same Spirit is active in all these distributing to each one as He wills” (1 Cor 12:7, 11), and later wrote, “Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. We all, with unveiled faces, are reflecting the glory of the Lord and are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory; this is from the Lord who is the Spirit” (2 Cor 3:17-18). And in Rom 7:6, Paul wrote that believers have been released from the law “so that we may serve in the new way of the Spirit.”

Commentary Judges Old Testament

Judges 9-12 records some of the most disturbing scenes in the Old Testament. The leadership of Abimelech and Jephthah, which was founded on love of power and bargaining with God, represents Israel’s downward spiral in the days of the judges.

Abimelech’s leadership was founded on a desire for power (Judges 9). Gideon’s many wives bore him 70 sons and his concubine in Shechem bore him Abimelech. Abimelech´s rise to power in Israel came at a time when there was a leadership vacuum following the death of his father, Gideon. In this state of affairs Abimelech approached his kin in Shechem, a historic and noteworthy city (see Gen 12:6-7; Joshua 24), with the proposition that they either “remember that I am your own flesh and blood” (Judg 9:2) and invite him to rule over them or allow Gideon’s other 70 sons—non-relatives—to fill the leadership void in Israel. The men of Shechem were easily persuaded (Judg 9:3) and with their payment Abimelech “hired worthless and reckless men…and they followed him” (Judg 9:4). Together they slaughtered all of Gideon’s sons, save Jotham, who confronted the leaders of Shechem because they had not “done well by Jerubbaal (Gideon)” (Judg 9:16), nor properly rewarded Gideon’s family for all that he had done.

Jephthah’s judgeship was characterized by bargaining with God (Judg 10:6-12:7). When the Israelites again worshiped the gods of the Canaanites inhabiting the land, the Lord handed Israel over to those pagan nations. Only the Lord’s pity saved Israel, as “He became weary of Israel’s misery” (Judg 10:16). After an unsuccessful attempt to engage the Ammonite king in diplomacy (Judg 11:12-28), Jephthah “made his vow to the LORD: ‘If You will hand over the Ammonites to me, whatever comes out of the doors of my house to greet me when I return in peace from the Ammonites will belong to the LORD, and I will offer it as a burnt offering” (Judg 11:31). The author of Judges wrote only two verses to record the great slaughter that ensued as the Lord handed the Ammonites over to Jephthah and the Israelite warriors, but seven verses (Judg11:34-40) to detail Jephthah’s remorse for bargaining with God when he vowed to offer one from his own household as a burnt sacrifice if the Lord gave him victory over the Ammonites.

Abimelech’s and Jephthah’s pursuit of power and attempts to bargain with God provide points of contrast with the new covenant ministry of Paul. Paul was ministering in a different epoch than the judges of Israel. Because of Christ, Paul operated with a greater understanding of God’s faithfulness. Paul’s confidence in God buoyed him to be forthright and honest in his relationship with the Corinthians. They had questioned Paul’s apostleship because between the time of writing 1 Corinthians and 2 Corinthians, he had changed his travel plans. While Paul had written saying, “I will come to you after I pass through Macedonia—for I will be traveling through Macedonia—and perhaps I will remain with you, or even spend the winter, that you may send me on my way wherever I go. I don’t want to see you now just in passing, for I hope to spend some time with you” (1 Cor 16:5-6a), he changed course and actually avoided them for a time. Paul delayed his visit, he went on to tell them in 2 Cor 1:23-2:2, because their behavior was worthy of discipline and Paul did not want to inflict pain on them or himself. Paul opened 2 Corinthians by defending himself in the matter—and he did so in light of God’s faithfulness in Christ. For Paul, the vows and maneuvering that characterized Abimelech and Jephthah were unnecessary. Paul placed his ministry and travels at the mercy of God in Christ noting that all of God’s promises are confirmed in Him. (2 Cor 1:15-20).

Commentary Judges Old Testament

God allowed Israel’s enemies to dominate them. When they cried out to God for deliverance, He sent judges to deliver them from oppression. The record of Gideon’s leadership in Judges 6-8 demonstrates that God was reigning over the events in Israel. Since God was the ultimate Deliverer of His people, He was unwilling to share His glory with any of the judges, Gideon included.

Gideon was called to deliver Israel from Midian, a nation related to Israel through Abraham (see Gen 25:1-3). They had ruled God’s people for seven years (Judg 6:1). Israel’s situation was so bad that they had been reduced to cave-dwellers and “became poverty-stricken” (Judg 6:2-6). God reminded the people that their situation was not His intent but rather the result of their disobedience (Judg 6:7-10). In this situation the Angel of the Lord called Gideon (Judg 6:11-14), and Gideon responded by asking, “How can I deliver Israel? Look, my family is the weakest in Manasseh, and I am the youngest in my father’s house” (Judg 6:15). Gideon was so weak in faith that he asked for signs to affirm that God was speaking with him (Judg 6:17-24) and that God would indeed deliver Israel through him (Judg 6:33-40). Gideon’s tepid spirit caused him to destroy his father’s altar to Baal only under the cover of the night (Judg 6:25-32).

To deliver His people from Midian, God employed a feeble Judge, an undersized army, and awkward battle strategy. While Gideon and company were camped just south of Midian, “the LORD said to Gideon, ‘You have too many people for Me to hand the Midianites over to you, or else Israel might brag: ‘I did it myself’” (Judg 7:2). After thinning the troops of Israel at the spring of Harod (Judg 7:4-8), the Lord fortified Gideon’s feeble heart as he and Purah heard the Midianites’ fearful confession that God had given Midian into the hands of His people (Judg 7:9-14). Indeed, Gideon’s saber was left spotless as “the LORD set the swords of each man in the (Midianite) army against each other” (Judg 7:22) when the pitchers were shattered and the Israelites blew their 300 trumpets (Judg 7:15-23).

The remainder of the story of Gideon shows what happens to a man who, although nothing in-and-of himself, takes credit for God’s work through him. Gideon’s descent began when Gideon compared his success with that of others, falsely praising their efforts beyond his own (Judg 7:24-8:3). Gideon even used his allies for his own glory (Judg 8:4-21). Gideon gave lip service to God while building a golden altar to himself and placing it in his hometown of Ophrah where Israel would come to prostitute themselves before it (Judg 8:22-27). “It became a snare to Gideon and his household,” the author wrote (Judg 8:27).

In the end, Israel resembled Gideon. Just as Gideon had used people for his own ends, likewise, “They did not show kindness to the house of Jerubbaal (that is, Gideon) for all the good he had done for Israel” (Judg 8:35). Despite the unfaithfulness of Gideon’s later days, the author of Hebrews set forth Gideon as an example of faith for his audience. Gideon was the first of four Judges listed as heroes of faith in Hebrews 11. But the author of Hebrews had more in mind in Heb 11:32 than recalling his audience to the sublime story of Gideon’s leadership, or the stories of Barak (Judges 4-5), Samson (Judges 13-16), and Jephthah (Judges 11-12). The author of Hebrews wished to make clear that Gideon’s ministry took place before the days of perfection, before the promises were fulfilled, before God provided better things in Christ. In Hebrews 11, like so many places in the New Testament, the argument is from the lesser to the greater. If God used Gideon—of the weakest family in his tribe and least in his father’s house (Judg 6:15)—to accomplish so much, what might God have for those who live in the days of fulfillment? Hebrews 11 concludes, “All these (Gideon and the Old Testament saints) were approved through their faith, but they did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, so that they would not be perfect without us” (Heb 11:39-40).

Commentary Judges Old Testament